The glamorous life of Las Vegas based model Jamie Frontz. A professional model's perspective on dating, sex, love, relationships, pop culture, and everything in between.
This month, I did something I rarely do; I bought a Cosmopolitan magazine. Don’t get me wrong, I love to read, (books) and occasional magazines but I find myself having no interest in the trashy gossip magazines and some of the like. However, when I travel sometimes as I pass by a magazine stand and a cover catches my eye or a specific topic I’ll pick one up for my flight.
Which leads me to my latest topic for Just Jamie. The title of the article was “Why So Many Men are Suckers for Skanks.” Now this wasn’t the original article that prompted me to buy Cosmopolitan but as I was perusing the magazine I came across this article. The general vibe of this sad piece of journalism was that all women who have fake boobs or any other enhanced features were ignorantly dubbed “skanks.” Claiming men are inherently attracted and drawn to women who fit into the prehistoric ideas of sexuality and exaggerated feminine features. Implying that these particular women mentioned in this article would have nothing else going for them if it weren’t for their enhanced cup size. This article also claimed that men only are attracted to these women because they represent the epitome of what their “normal wives or girlfriends” don’t, and that men can feel freer to ask for “taboo” sex acts or be disrespectful with a woman who has these types of enhancements. I’m sorry, but are we still living in the 40s? I thought we were a bit more evolved than the ridiculous notion that if a woman enjoys her sexuality or embraces sex and feeling good that she is a “skank?” Since when is it acceptable to condone disrespect of any woman based on what she looks like?